![]() ![]() The categories being 9th level prepared > 9th level spontaneous > 6th level > 4th level. It uses the lowest spell level of the left most class category. The ruling there wasn’t actually about “most common” it was about its location in spell list for prepared 9th level casters… It was in one of the rule books somewhere that the default price for wands, scrolls, and potions is based on the table going from left to right. Given wayang spellhunter would effectively reduce a spells level for a specific caster, but not in general, then a empowered CLW wand should also be a 3rd level wand, even if a. For wands/scrolls in the economy it should use the common level of the spell. The same would apply to other spells where certain spell casting classes or archetypes get a specific spell a level sooner (or a level later). Somewhere in these forums (or maybe there is even a FAQ on it, can't recall) it has been stated that wands of lesser restoration should be counted as level 2 because that is what it most commonly is. For most casters lesser restoration is a level 2 spell. This is similar to a wand of lesser restoration. So what this eventually comes down to is the GM will have to decide if the spell storing weapon usage should go by the common level of the spell, or allow a specific caster to get more benefit out of it. Given wayang spellhunter would effectively reduce a spells level for a specific caster, but not in general, then a empowered CLW wand should also be a 3rd level wand, even if a select few casters in the world could technically make it a 2nd. Could I wayang spellhunter CLW and create a 2nd level empowered wand of CLW? And in doing so undercut all the other crafters of empowered CLW wands? That is probably not the intent. However, wayang spellhunter does create a economics problem in this scenario. But if I had empower spell, I could not use it when using a vanilla level 1 wand of CLW. I could create a wand of wand of empowered Cure Light Wounds. You are casting the spell into the weapon - in this stage you can apply your feats/etc because you are actually doing the spellcasting. The other FAQ willuwontu provided is questionably applicable. The least beneficial is level 3 across the board for this scenario. Wayang spellhunter (with vampiric touch): -1 level (level 3) ![]() ![]() If you are going to use something as a rules analogue it should be potions.Ģ) there is an FAQ that answers this… basically, the ruling is that whichever is of least benefit is what you treat the spell level as for situations like this… as such it still counts as a spell level of 4.Īn intesified vampiric touch with wayang spell hunter is a level 3 in all aspects. The rules for creating potions are largely identical to the rules for spellstoring items as well. A potion is the magic of a cast spell stored in liquid form, it is then “cast” again when someone drinks it. Potions are more in line with a spellstoring item as potions are technically spellstoring items themselves. Scrolls behave as instructions to cast the spell. To mysterious strangers point using scrolls as reasoning… scrolls are fundamentally different. The closest we have is a ruling for magic item creation that allows the use of metamagic and class features to augment spells used in crafting potions. To my knowledge there is no official ruling on this. ![]() But that FAQ has no baring on how things work the other direction, when the sorcerer is the one casting the spell to be stored. They would be unable to apply their arcana or any other abilities to the spell cast this way. The FAQ you linked for 3 would apply in the event that a sorcerer activated a spellstoring weapon to cast the stored spell. 1) Never been anything officially stated, and varies by the table. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |